linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND] Fast TSC calibration fails with v3.14-rc1 and later

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53212D14.1090906@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:59:16 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Julian Wollrath <jwollrath@....de>, x86@...nel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] Fast TSC calibration fails with v3.14-rc1 and later

On 03/12/2014 08:55 PM, joeyli wrote:
> 
> So do not care "CMOS RTC Not Present", if TAD is present then we use it
> instead of CMOS RTC in all kernel code? or we still can use CMOS RTC?
> 

Why would we use *both*!?  How would that possibly make sense?

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/