[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140313160915.17f0a285ae1cde36dbc76399@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:09:15 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, pmladek@...e.cz,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] kernel: Avoid softlockups in stop_machine() during
heavy printing
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:58:38 +0100 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> When there are lots of messages accumulated in printk buffer, printing
> them (especially over serial console) can take a long time (tens of
> seconds). stop_machine() will effectively make all cpus spin in
> multi_cpu_stop() waiting for the CPU doing printing to print all the
> messages which triggers NMI softlockup watchdog and RCU stall detector
> which add even more to the messages to print. Since machine doesn't do
> anything (except serving interrupts) during this time, also network
> connections are dropped and other disturbances may happen.
>
> Paper over the problem by waiting for printk buffer to be empty before
> starting to stop CPUs. In theory a burst of new messages can be appended
> to the printk buffer before CPUs enter multi_cpu_stop() so this isn't a 100%
> solution but it works OK in practice and I'm not aware of a reasonably
> simple better solution.
>
Yes it's rather hacky, but it's simple and direct and explicit and
obvious. It's the stealth hackiness which causes harm.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists