linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL v2] timers updates for 3.15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:36:52 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Archs <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Huiqingding <huding@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] timers updates for 3.15


* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:

> So I propose you something even more simple. The choice of 
> tip:timers/core as a base was actually just about topic. But there 
> is no dependency on it. (And actually sched/core would have been a 
> better choice for a base if any).
> 
> So in order to fix the conflict and minimize the dependencies, I 
> just rebased the patches on top of tip:core/locking only. No merge 
> on top of that. It seems to work pretty well.
> 
> The pullable result is in sched/cputime on my tree. Let me know if 
> that's ok for you.

Yeah, that sounds excellent. Thomas, you might want to keep this in a 
sparate branch from timers/core though. We still have timers/nohz for 
example.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/