[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5322D28C.9080009@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:57:32 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: fix cr8 intercept window
Il 13/03/2014 18:08, Radim Krčmář ha scritto:
> > I agree that old code is wrong and the patch looks correct, but I only
> > see how the bug may cause pending IRR to not be delivered in time,
> > not how interrupt can disrupt a higher priority task.
Right. Also, on SMP guests the effect would likely be just a deadlock
if a lower-priority ISR interrupted a higher priority task and accessed
shared data (since you need anyway a spinlock in addition to raising the
IRQL).
A more likely explanation is that if the remote processor delays an IPI
too much, it will have a stable TLB entry. The resulting random
corruption of paged memory is compatible with the BAD_POOL_HEADER error
codes that Radim observed.
> Paolo, can you change the last sentence to ", which means we don't
> inject pending IRR immediately."? (or do we just forget it?)
It's already in Linus's tree.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists