[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140314131734.GB5276@krava.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:17:35 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...hat.com, jmario@...hat.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Speed up thread map generation
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:16:37PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
SNIP
> + event->fork.ptid = tgid;
> + event->fork.pid = tgid;
> + event->fork.tid = pid;
> + event->fork.header.type = PERF_RECORD_FORK;
> +
> + event->fork.header.size = (sizeof(event->fork) + machine->id_hdr_size);
> +
> + if (process(tool, event, &synth_sample, machine) != 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events(struct perf_tool *tool,
> union perf_event *event,
> pid_t pid, pid_t tgid,
> @@ -287,6 +309,11 @@ static int __event__synthesize_thread(union perf_event *comm_event,
> DIR *tasks;
> struct dirent dirent, *next;
> pid_t tgid;
> + union perf_event *fork_event;
> +
> + fork_event = malloc(sizeof(fork_event->fork) + machine->id_hdr_size);
> + if (fork_event == NULL)
> + return -1;
need to be freed
maybe we could move the allocation one level up,
same as for mmap_event and comm_event
otherwise I think the logic with FORK event is correct
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists