[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACZ9PQXNK=z-bk8BJ8rmU9dJiEAcoHBFBoGDK_QoJ0NQFweufQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 23:23:45 +0900
From: Roman Peniaev <r.peniaev@...il.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/mpage.c: forgotten WRITE_SYNC in case of data
integrity write
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Fri 14-03-14 10:11:43, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> > Also, could you please help me do understand how can I guarantee
>> > integrity in case of block device with big volatile
>> > cache and filesystem, which does not support REQ_FLUSH/FUA?
>>
>> If a device has a volatile cache but doesn't support flush, it can't
>> guarantee integrity. There's no way for its user to determine or
>> force whether certain data is on non-volatile media. It's an
>> inherently broken device.
> I think his problem was that the device does support REQ_FLUSH/FUA but
> the filesystem on top of it doesn't issue it properly. That's a filesystem
> problem so fix the filesystem... :) Which one is it?
take any old school, e.g. ext2 or even better: fat :)
--
Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists