linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/mpage.c: forgotten WRITE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 15 Mar 2014 00:36:35 +0900
From:	Roman Peniaev <r.peniaev@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/mpage.c: forgotten WRITE_SYNC in case of data
 integrity write

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:07:04PM +0900, Roman Peniaev wrote:
>> Seems the following message should be better:
>> When data inegrity operation (sync, fsync, fdatasync calls) happens
>> writeback control is set to WB_SYNC_ALL.
>> In that case all write requests are marked with WRITE_SYNC, but on
>> mpage writeback path
>> WRITE_SYNC is missed. This patch fixes this.
>>
>> Is it ok, what do you think?
>
> I think the description should make it clear that WRITE_SYNC is about
> latency, not about integrity and we probably should add comments
> explaining why we're using WRITE_SYNC for WB_SYNC_ALL (because there
> probably is someone waiting).

I sent v2 of the patch where I tried to be more explicit in details.
Please, check.

--
Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/