[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53232901.5030307@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:06:25 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: vmscan: do not swap anon pages just because free+file
is low
On 03/14/2014 11:35 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Page reclaim force-scans / swaps anonymous pages when file cache drops
> below the high watermark of a zone in order to prevent what little
> cache remains from thrashing.
>
> However, on bigger machines the high watermark value can be quite
> large and when the workload is dominated by a static anonymous/shmem
> set, the file set might just be a small window of used-once cache. In
> such situations, the VM starts swapping heavily when instead it should
> be recycling the no longer used cache.
>
> This is a longer-standing problem, but it's more likely to trigger
> after 81c0a2bb515f ("mm: page_alloc: fair zone allocator policy")
> because file pages can no longer accumulate in a single zone and are
> dispersed into smaller fractions among the available zones.
>
> To resolve this, do not force scan anon when file pages are low but
> instead rely on the scan/rotation ratios to make the right prediction.
I am not entirely sure that the scan/rotation ratio will be
meaningful when the page cache has been essentially depleted,
but on larger systems the distance between the low and high
watermark is gigantic, and I have no better idea on how to
fix the bug you encountered, so ...
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: <stable@...nel.org> [3.12+]
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists