[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7511.1394817275@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 17:14:35 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Safford <safford@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: 'ioctl' for keyrings
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > As I understand the code, I think operations being performed from ->update()
> > are:
> >
> > (a) Resealing a key with a new pcrs (trusted).
> >
> > (b) Changing the master key (encrypted).
> >
> > Mimi, Dmitry: is this list right?
>
> In addition to resealing trusted keys to a new TPM PCR value, there are
> a few other options that can be modified (eg. keyauth, blobauth,
> pcrlock). Encrypted keys can be encrypted/decrypted with a new master
> key (trusted or user key type).
Can (re)sealing a key be viewed as encrypting it? Is the difference between
sealing a key and encrypting a key the use of hardware support?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists