[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <532339EB.5090304@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:18:35 +0100
From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
To: Yuvaraj Kumar <yuvaraj.cd@...il.com>,
"kgene.kim@...sung.com" <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
sunil joshi <joshi@...sung.com>,
"ks.giri@...sung.com" <ks.giri@...sung.com>, thomas.ab@...sung.com,
Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: exynos5250: turn on the LDO10 on SMDK5250
Hi Yuvaraj,
On 14.03.2014 09:26, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote:
> Any comments on this?
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@...il.com> wrote:
>> Commit 275dcd2 "ARM: dts: add max77686 pmic node for smdk5250" added
>> required LDO's for SMDK5250 boards.Currently LDO10 is turned off.As LDO10,
>> enable/disable the LDO22 which is required for VDDQ_MMC2_AP.So this patch
>> makes LDO10 turn's on always.
This does not seem right to me. Why a regulator used by MMC should be
always enabled? Shouldn't it be specified as one of the MMC regulators
in corresponding MMC controller node?
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists