[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140315000343.GD5687@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 00:03:43 +0000
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:14:55AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 11:37 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 16:21 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > It's a series of rather complex patches. I really don't think
> > > duplicating them is a good idea. We can either resurrect the old API
> > > to kill it again or set up a merge branch which I don't think is too
> > > unusual in situations like this.
> >
> > Right, a topic branch that gets merged in both driver-core-next and
> > powerpc-next.
>
> Just want to make sure we agree ... ie, the offending commit is already
> in powerpc-next on my side and I can't really back it out (I could
> revert it though).
You can pull in driver-core-next into your tree if you want, it's not
going to be reverted, and will be sent to Linus for 3.15-rc1, so you can
base your work on it and fix up the api usage in your tree that way.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists