[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <990f1cbc-fa54-4cb2-a9ee-394a1a6d5f07@email.android.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 06:57:01 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@...gle.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Frank Swiderski <fes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: make the queue depth the max supportable by the hypervisor
On March 14, 2014 11:34:31 PM EDT, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>The current virtio block sets a queue depth of 64, which is
>insufficient for very fast devices. It has been demonstrated that
>with a high IOPS device, using a queue depth of 256 can double the
>IOPS which can be sustained.
>
>As suggested by Venkatash Srinivas, set the queue depth by default to
>be one half the the device's virtqueue, which is the maximum queue
>depth that can be supported by the channel to the host OS (each I/O
>request requires at least two VQ entries).
>
>Also allow the queue depth to be something which can be set at module
>load time or via a kernel boot-time parameter, for
>testing/benchmarking purposes.
>
>Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
>Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@...gle.com>
>Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
>Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
>Cc: virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org
>Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
>Cc: Frank Swiderski <fes@...gle.com>
>---
>
>This is a combination of my patch and Vekatash's patch. I agree that
>setting the default automatically is better than requiring the user to
>set the value by hand.
>
> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>index 6a680d4..0f70c01 100644
>--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>@@ -481,6 +481,9 @@ static struct blk_mq_ops virtio_mq_ops = {
> .free_hctx = blk_mq_free_single_hw_queue,
> };
>
>+static int queue_depth = -1;
>+module_param(queue_depth, int, 0444);
?
>+
> static struct blk_mq_reg virtio_mq_reg = {
> .ops = &virtio_mq_ops,
> .nr_hw_queues = 1,
>@@ -551,9 +554,14 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device
>*vdev)
> goto out_free_vq;
> }
>
>+ virtio_mq_reg.queue_depth = queue_depth > 0 ? queue_depth :
>+ (vblk->vq->num_free / 2);
> virtio_mq_reg.cmd_size =
> sizeof(struct virtblk_req) +
> sizeof(struct scatterlist) * sg_elems;
>+ virtblk_name_format("vd", index, vblk->disk->disk_name,
>DISK_NAME_LEN);
>+ pr_info("%s: using queue depth %d\n", vblk->disk->disk_name,
>+ virtio_mq_reg.queue_depth);
Isn't that visible from sysfs?
>
> q = vblk->disk->queue = blk_mq_init_queue(&virtio_mq_reg, vblk);
> if (!q) {
>@@ -565,8 +573,6 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device
>*vdev)
>
> q->queuedata = vblk;
>
>- virtblk_name_format("vd", index, vblk->disk->disk_name,
>DISK_NAME_LEN);
>-
> vblk->disk->major = major;
> vblk->disk->first_minor = index_to_minor(index);
> vblk->disk->private_data = vblk;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists