[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d2hlthzi.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:13:53 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf tools: Allocate thread map_groups dynamicaly
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:00:04 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Moving towards sharing map groups within a process threads.
>
> Because of this we need the map groups to be dynamically
> allocated. No other functional change is intended in here.
> @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ void thread__find_addr_map(struct thread *thread,
> al->cpumode = cpumode;
> al->filtered = false;
>
> - if (machine == NULL) {
> + if ((machine == NULL) || (mg == NULL)) {
> al->map = NULL;
> return;
> }
What about the kernel threads? I guess they're not using thread->mg but
machine->kmaps instead?
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists