lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871ty1thgk.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:25:15 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf tools: Share process map groups within process threads

On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:00:06 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> +	if (!mg) {
> +		struct thread *leader = thread__get_leader(thread);
> +
> +		if (!leader)
> +			return NULL;
> +
> +		if (leader->mg)
> +			mg = leader->mg;
> +		else
> +			mg = thread__map_groups_alloc(leader);
> +
> +		if (leader != thread)
> +			thread->mg = mg;
> +
> +		mg->refcnt++;

What's the value of mg->refcnt here in case of leader != thread and
leader->mg was not allocated originally?  I think it's 1 - but shouldn't
it be 2 since it's referenced from both of leader and the thread now?

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ