[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871ty1thgk.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:25:15 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf tools: Share process map groups within process threads
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:00:06 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> + if (!mg) {
> + struct thread *leader = thread__get_leader(thread);
> +
> + if (!leader)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (leader->mg)
> + mg = leader->mg;
> + else
> + mg = thread__map_groups_alloc(leader);
> +
> + if (leader != thread)
> + thread->mg = mg;
> +
> + mg->refcnt++;
What's the value of mg->refcnt here in case of leader != thread and
leader->mg was not allocated originally? I think it's 1 - but shouldn't
it be 2 since it's referenced from both of leader and the thread now?
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists