[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140317101527.GB27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 11:15:27 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
vegard.nossum@...cle.com, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: kmemcheck: OS boot failed because NMI handlers access the memory
tracked by kmemcheck
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:19:33PM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> Now we don't support page faults in NMI context is that we
> may already be handling an existing fault (or trap) when the NMI hits.
> So that would mess up kmemcheck's working state.
I think it was suggested earlier that kmemcheck could maybe have a stack
of states.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists