lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140317112332.4a0700d8@armhf>
Date:	Mon, 17 Mar 2014 11:23:32 +0100
From:	Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
To:	Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 2/4] ASoC: simple-card: dynamically
 allocate the DAI link and properties

On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 11:29:42 +0200
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com> wrote:

> On 03/15/2014 01:09 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > The DAI link array and the properties (fmt, sysclk slots) are
> > hard-coded for a single CPU / CODEC link.
> >
> > This patch dynamically allocates the DAI link array and the
> > properties with the aim of supporting many DAI links.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
> > ---
> >   sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c b/sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c
> > index ca7e63e..a55dc46 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c
> > @@ -20,9 +20,11 @@
> >
> >   struct simple_card_data {
> >   	struct snd_soc_card snd_card;
> > -	struct asoc_simple_dai cpu_dai;
> > -	struct asoc_simple_dai codec_dai;
> > -	struct snd_soc_dai_link snd_link;
> > +	struct simple_dais {
> > +		struct asoc_simple_dai cpu_dai;
> > +		struct asoc_simple_dai codec_dai;
> > +	} *dais;
> > +	struct snd_soc_dai_link dai_link[];	/* dynamically allocated */
> >   };
> >
> 
> This is only an implementation detail, but wouldn't it produce a cleaner 
> implementation if you would write the above structure like this:
> 
>    struct simple_card_data {
>    	struct snd_soc_card snd_card;
> 	struct simple_dai_links {
> 		struct snd_soc_dai_link dai_link;
> 		struct asoc_simple_dai cpu_dai;
> 		struct asoc_simple_dai codec_dai;
> 	} *dai_links;
>    };
> 
> or even
> 
>    struct simple_card_data {
>    	struct snd_soc_card snd_card;
> 	struct simple_dai_links {
> 		struct snd_soc_dai_link dai_link;
> 		struct asoc_simple_dai cpu_dai;
> 		struct asoc_simple_dai codec_dai;
> 	} dai_links[]; /* dynamically allocated */
>    };
> 
> But, as said this only an implementation detail.

Jyri,

No, this would not work. The DAI link in the struct snd_soc_card is an
array of struct snd_soc_dai_link. There cannot be anything between the
elements!

-- 
Ken ar c'hentaƱ	|	      ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef		|		http://moinejf.free.fr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ