[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <532665ED.7090401@hitachi.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:03:09 +0900
From: Yoshihiro YUNOMAE <yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@...achi.com>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V3] serial/uart/8250: Add tunable RX interrupt
trigger I/F of FIFO buffers
Hi Heikki,
Thank you for your reply.
(2014/03/14 23:16), Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:21:54AM +0900, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
>> void serial8250_clear_and_reinit_fifos(struct uart_8250_port *p)
>> {
>> - unsigned char fcr;
>> -
>> serial8250_clear_fifos(p);
>> - fcr = uart_config[p->port.type].fcr;
>> - serial_out(p, UART_FCR, fcr);
>> + p->fcr = uart_config[p->port.type].fcr;
>> + serial_out(p, UART_FCR, p->fcr);
>
> You should allow also the probe drivers to set this..
>
> if (!p->fcr)
> p->fcr = uart_config[p->port.type].fcr;
Oh, I'll fix it.
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(serial8250_clear_and_reinit_fifos);
>>
>> @@ -2325,10 +2323,19 @@ serial8250_do_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios,
>> if ((baud < 2400 && !up->dma) || fifo_bug) {
>> fcr &= ~UART_FCR_TRIGGER_MASK;
>> fcr |= UART_FCR_TRIGGER_1;
>> + /* Don't use user setting RX trigger */
>> + up->fcr = 0;
>
> I don't know about this but..
>
>> }
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> + * If up->fcr exists, a user has opened this port, changed RX trigger,
>> + * or read RX trigger before. So, we don't need to change up->fcr here.
>> + */
>> + if (!up->fcr)
>> + up->fcr = fcr;
>
> Why not just set fcr = up->fcr in the beginning of the function?
Ah, we don't need to set up->fcr = 0 in the previous flow when we
implement as follows:
unsigned char fcr = up->fcr;
... <snip> ...
/*
* If fcr exists, a user has opened this port, changed RX
* trigger, or read RX trigger before. If so, we do not change
* fcr.
*/
if (!fcr)
fcr = uart_config[port_type].fcr;
if ((baud < 2400 && !up->dma) || fifo_bug) {
fcr &= ~UART_FCR_TRIGGER_MASK;
fcr |= UART_FCR_TRIGGER_1;
}
up->fcr = fcr;
> <snip>
>
>> +static int do_set_rx_int_trig(struct tty_port *port, unsigned char val)
>> +{
>> + struct uart_state *state = container_of(port, struct uart_state, port);
>> + struct uart_port *uport = state->uart_port;
>> + struct uart_8250_port *up =
>> + container_of(uport, struct uart_8250_port, port);
>> + unsigned char fcr;
>> + int rx_trig;
>> +
>> + if (!(up->capabilities & UART_CAP_FIFO) || uport->fifosize <= 1)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + rx_trig = convert_val2rxtrig(up, val);
>> + if (rx_trig < 0)
>> + return rx_trig;
>> +
>> + serial8250_clear_fifos(up);
>> + if (!up->fcr)
>> + /* termios is not set yet */
>> + fcr = uart_config[up->port.type].fcr;
>> + else
>> + fcr = up->fcr;
>> + fcr &= ~UART_FCR_TRIGGER_MASK;
>> + fcr |= (unsigned char)rx_trig;
>> + up->fcr = fcr;
>> + serial_out(up, UART_FCR, up->fcr);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> Where are you setting UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO bit? Am I missing
> something?
In these implementation, the driver sets up->fcr as
uart_config[up->port.type].fcr first and changes only RX trigger. So,
we don't need to set the bit in a direct way.
Thank you,
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
--
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists