[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+8MBbLczQQdDrQSjWvpxVF7yJr4p5TVxTSsg5HtBngw+=CmmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:14:48 -0700
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@...hat.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, sgrubb@...hat.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] pid: get pid_t ppid of task in init_pid_ns
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> Added the functions task_ppid_nr_ns() and task_ppid_nr() to abstract the lookup
> of the PPID (real_parent's pid_t) of a process, including rcu locking, in the
> arbitrary and init_pid_ns.
> This provides an alternative to sys_getppid(), which is relative to the child
> process' pid namespace.
...
> +static int pid_alive(const struct task_struct *p);
This patch (or some successor version of it) showed up
in next-20140317 and the above declaration caused a
bunch of warnings on ia64:
include/linux/sched.h:1718: warning: 'pid_alive' declared inline after
being called
[repeated 1675 times across files that include this]
The ia64 complier is a lot happier if "inline" is added like this:
static inline int pid_alive(const struct task_struct *p);
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists