[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADHgK6tHngKVZS=jo=VYt3Nt3dhiEmiWr28iDy7q_uR9goBj=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:39:39 -0700
From: Sebastian Capella <sebastian.capella@...aro.org>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com>,
Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Sricharan R <r.sricharan@...com>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] ARM hibernation / suspend-to-disk
On 17 March 2014 13:44, Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Mar 17, Sebastian Capella wrote:
>> On 16 March 2014 00:09, Ezequiel Garcia
>> <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>> > On Mar 05, Sebastian Capella wrote:
>> > [..]
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
>> >> index 1f8fed9..83707702 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -611,6 +611,11 @@ config CPU_USE_DOMAINS
>> >> config IO_36
>> >> bool
>> >>
>> >> +config ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE
...
>> > Is there any reason why CPU_FEROCEON is not listed here? FWIW, I've just built
>> > (but not really tested) a Kirkwood kernel with CONFIG_HIBERNATION=y.
...
> Sure, no problem. If you consider that build-test is enough, feel free to put
> CPU_FEROCEON on that list. We added suspend/resume to feroceon not long ago.
>> > And is there any reason to put this config in arch/arm/mm/Kconfig, instead of
>> > in arch/arm/Kconfig, below ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE?
...
> I guess my question wasn't clear. I mean to ask: Are there any other
> requirements on an ARM platform to support hibernation, other than
> suspend/resume support?
>
> If this is the *only* requirement, it seems to me we could make our
> ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE also select ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE.
Thanks, I've added it like this in arch/arm/Kconfig. I'm sure you
know, but this way also takes care of the CPU_FEROCEON in the default
list since SUSPEND_POSSIBLE already contains it.
config ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE
bool
depends on MMU
default y if ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE
Does this look ok?
Thanks!
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists