[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140318141811.GC3585@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:18:11 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tools lib traceevent: use else-if cascade, not
separate ifs
Em Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:30:06AM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:10:48 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Em Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 05:02:09PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:26:36 -0400, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> > > > When token cannot be more than one value, it seems wasteful to go
> > > > through all the strcmp() calls. Use an else-if cascade instead.
> > > I think the end result will be same since it returns from inside the
> > > block, right?
> >
> > Exactly :-)
> >
> > We could have it changed to something like:
> >
> > if (strcmp()) {
> > ret = bla();
> > goto out_free_token;
> > }
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > out_free_token:
> > free_token(token);
> > return ret;
> Honestly, I prefer the original, thus I would add a NAK to this patch.
No problem with that, if I had written that code, I'd prefer the gotos,
but that is kinda personal preference.
Yeah, I'd nack that patch as well, changes nothing.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists