[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53285FDB.40102@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:01:47 -0700
From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: dirk.brandewie@...il.com, Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@...il.com>,
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] intel_pstate: Set core to min P state during core
offline
On 03/17/2014 10:44 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 2:33 AM, <dirk.brandewie@...il.com> wrote:
>> +
>> static int intel_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> {
>> struct cpudata *cpu;
>> @@ -818,7 +824,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver intel_pstate_driver = {
>> .setpolicy = intel_pstate_set_policy,
>> .get = intel_pstate_get,
>> .init = intel_pstate_cpu_init,
>> - .exit = intel_pstate_cpu_exit,
>> + .stop = intel_pstate_cpu_stop,
>
> Probably, keep exit as is and only change P-state in stop(). So that
> allocation of resources happen in init() and they are freed in exit()?
>
I looked at doing just that but it junked up the code. if stop() is called
during PREPARE then init() will be called via __cpufreq_add_dev() in the ONLINE
and DOWN_FAILED case. So once stop() is called the driver will be ready for
init() to be called exactly like when exit() is called.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists