[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140318161923.GF11706@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:19:23 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
rob@...dley.net, sameo@...ux.intel.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] regulator: arizona-ldo1: Add processing of init_data
from device tree
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:07:01PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:15:42AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:49:13AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > > + np_init = of_get_child_by_name(arizona->dev->of_node, "wlf,ldo1");
> > You're missing an of_node_put() for this and if you're going to use
> > hungarian notation please use a convention other people use. Calling
> > things _node seems more common.
> The DCVDD one needs an of_node_put but I am not sure this one
> does. As it will be copied into the regulator device of_node by
> the regulator core so wont of_node_put be called when the device
> is destroyed? Admittedly I haven't checked that but seems
> sensible that the device structure would put its of_node when it
> closes down.
You just took an extra reference by calling of_get_child_by_name(), you
need to free it.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists