linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] regulator: arizona-ldo1: Add processing of init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:19:23 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	rob@...dley.net, sameo@...ux.intel.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] regulator: arizona-ldo1: Add processing of init_data
 from device tree

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:07:01PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:15:42AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:49:13AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:

> > > +	np_init = of_get_child_by_name(arizona->dev->of_node, "wlf,ldo1");

> > You're missing an of_node_put() for this and if you're going to use
> > hungarian notation please use a convention other people use.  Calling
> > things _node seems more common.

> The DCVDD one needs an of_node_put but I am not sure this one
> does. As it will be copied into the regulator device of_node by
> the regulator core so wont of_node_put be called when the device
> is destroyed? Admittedly I haven't checked that but seems
> sensible that the device structure would put its of_node when it
> closes down.

You just took an extra reference by calling of_get_child_by_name(), you
need to free it.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)