[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140318161050.ab184d30edf4b2446a2060de@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:10:50 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG -next] "mm: per-thread vma caching fix 5" breaks s390
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:06:59 -0700 Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Heiko Carstens
> <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > Given that this is just an addon patch to Davidlohr's "mm: per-thread
> > vma caching" patch I was wondering if something in there is architecture
> > specific.
> > But it doesn't look like that. So I'm wondering if this only breaks on
> > s390?
>
> I'm seeing this same BUG_ON() on ia64 (when trying out next-20140318)
-next is missing
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-per-thread-vma-caching-fix-6.patch.
Am presently trying to cook up an mmotm for tomorrow's -next.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists