linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: make the queue depth configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1395211832.8649.40.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2014 23:50:32 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, fes@...gle.com,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: make the queue depth configurable

On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 17:07 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:

> Summary of http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/14/363 :
> 
>   Ted: module_param(queue_depth, int, 444)
>   Joe: 0444!
>   Rusty: User perms >= group perms >= other perms?
>   Joe: CLASS_ATTR, DEVICE_ATTR, SENSOR_ATTR and SENSOR_ATTR_2?

<smile>

Adding:

Rusty: Bikeshedding
Joe: Missing ((perm) & 2) ?

[]

> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index 471090093c67..945afeb3058a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -842,4 +842,13 @@ static inline void ftrace_dump(enum ftrace_dump_mode oops_dump_mode) { }
>  # define REBUILD_DUE_TO_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
>  #endif
>  
> +/* Permissions on a sysfs file: you didn't miss the 0 prefix did you? */
> +#define VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(perms)					\
> +	((__builtin_constant_p(perms) ?					\
> +	  BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perms) < 0) +				\
> +	  BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perms) > 0777) +				\
> +	  /* User perms >= group perms >= other perms */		\
> +	  BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(((perms) >> 6) < (((perms) >> 3) & 7)) +	\
> +	  BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perms) >> 3) & 7) < ((perms) & 7)): 0) +	\
> +	 (perms))
>  #endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> index 175f6995d1af..204a67743804 100644
> --- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> +++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> @@ -186,14 +186,12 @@ struct kparam_array
>     parameters. */
>  #define __module_param_call(prefix, name, ops, arg, perm, level)	\
>  	/* Default value instead of permissions? */			\
> -	static int __param_perm_check_##name __attribute__((unused)) =	\
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perm) < 0 || (perm) > 0777 || ((perm) & 2))	\

Now missing test for ((perm) & 2)

Dunno if that was ever necessary.

> -	+ BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(sizeof(""prefix) > MAX_PARAM_PREFIX_LEN);	\
> -	static const char __param_str_##name[] = prefix #name;		\
> +	static const char __param_str_##name[] = prefix #name; \
>  	static struct kernel_param __moduleparam_const __param_##name	\
>  	__used								\
>      __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ ("__param"),aligned(sizeof(void *)))) \
> -	= { __param_str_##name, ops, perm, level, { arg } }
> +	= { __param_str_##name, ops, VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(perm),	\
> +	    level, { arg } }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/