[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140319075428.GA25529@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:54:28 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: replace blk_mq_init_commands with a
->init_request method
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:08:20AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > + blk_rq_init(q, q->flush_rq);
> > + if (reg->cmd_size)
> > + q->flush_rq->special =
> > + blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(q->flush_rq);
> > +
> > + if (reg->ops->init_request(driver_data,
> > + NULL, q->flush_rq, -1))
> > + goto err_flush_rq;
> > + }
>
> The above looks a bit weird because q->flush_rq is invisible to
> driver and should always be initialized no matter if driver defines
> its .init_request callback or not.
You mean the blk_rq_init? We already do a real initialization before
actually using it, it's just there to prevent passing a half-initialized
one to the driver.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists