[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVMgZUDjCLWOj-D3UfpmuX3hUHDLydc6FQY4qCzUyeupWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:48:47 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: replace blk_mq_init_commands with a
->init_request method
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:08:20AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> > + blk_rq_init(q, q->flush_rq);
>> > + if (reg->cmd_size)
>> > + q->flush_rq->special =
>> > + blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(q->flush_rq);
>> > +
>> > + if (reg->ops->init_request(driver_data,
>> > + NULL, q->flush_rq, -1))
>> > + goto err_flush_rq;
>> > + }
>>
>> The above looks a bit weird because q->flush_rq is invisible to
>> driver and should always be initialized no matter if driver defines
>> its .init_request callback or not.
>
> You mean the blk_rq_init? We already do a real initialization before
> actually using it, it's just there to prevent passing a half-initialized
> one to the driver.
>
OK.
Actually it doesn't matter because flush_rq will be reinitialized
before using, not like common request. And driver should only
initialize req->special instead of the request itself, maybe it is
better to document the fact.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists