| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:48:20 +0100 From: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon.dev@...il.com> To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com> CC: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>, Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...phandler.com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: rework main and slow clk implementation Hello Jean-Christophe, Le 19/03/2014 07:06, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit : > You must keep me in Cc I always did, this is an oversight. > > first and last warning Now, this is my turn. I don't like to be threatened, especially when this message is only sent to me. BTW, last warning, then what ? Now let's talk about your attitude. Regarding this specific series: I sent you several versions of the at91 CCF based clk implementation and you never fully reviewed those series (despite the fact you told me you would do it), why are you so interested in the at91 CCF implementation now ? Moreover, most of the time when you review a patchset your remarks are far from constructive, and we always have to ask you several times to get a real explanation. I'm not telling you're wrong when you "NACK" something, but explaining the reasons are part of your maintainer's job. This being said, I'll take care to keep you in Cc of all at91 related patches. Best Regards, Boris > > On Mar 19, 2014, at 4:18 AM, Boris BREZILLON <brezillonboris@...il.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> This series introduce the real clock model (as described in atmel datasheets) >> for slow and main clocks. >> >> The modifications introduced by this series break the DT compat, but, as the >> at91 CCF based implementation is pretty new (introduced in 3.14 only for sama5 >> eval boards) I think it won't impact a lot of users. >> >> I tested it on sama5d3. >> Alexandre, Jean-Jacques, could you test this series on your eval boards >> (sam9261ek and sam9rlek) so that we can move to this new model and hopefully >> consider the at91 clk DT binding as (almost :-)) stable. >> >> Jean-Jacques, as you can see I reworked my first implementation as you >> suggested, do you want me to add your Signed-off-by in the next version ? >> >> Mike, if this series is accepted, I'd like to get it merged as soon as possible >> to prevent other developpers from using a deprecated DT binding. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Boris >> >> Boris BREZILLON (11): >> clk: at91: rework main clk implementation >> clk: at91: update main clk documentation >> clk: at91: add slow clks driver >> clk: at91: add slow clk documentation >> ARM: at91/dt: move sama5d3 SoC to the new main/slow clk model >> ARM: at91/dt: add xtal frequencies to sama5d3xcm boards >> ARM: at91/dt: add xtal frequencies to sama5d3 xplained board >> ARM: at91/dt: move at91sam9261 SoC to the new main clock model >> ARM: at91/dt: define main xtal frequency of the at91sam9261ek board >> ARM: at91/dt: move at91sam9rl SoC to the new slow/main clock models >> ARM: at91/dt: define sam9rlek crystal frequencies >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt | 128 ++++- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts | 10 + >> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261.dtsi | 10 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts | 4 + >> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi | 45 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rlek.dts | 8 + >> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi | 61 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3xcm.dtsi | 10 + >> drivers/clk/at91/Makefile | 4 +- >> drivers/clk/at91/clk-main.c | 581 +++++++++++++++++--- >> drivers/clk/at91/clk-slow.c | 467 ++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c | 12 + >> drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h | 9 + >> drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c | 57 ++ >> drivers/clk/at91/sckc.h | 22 + >> include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h | 1 + >> 16 files changed, 1342 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/at91/clk-slow.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/at91/sckc.h >> >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list >> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists