| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3412995.vP12DfufVI@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:27:01 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: remove unused notifier: CPUFREQ_{SUSPENDCHANGE|RESUMECHANGE}
On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 12:22:01 PM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 03/19/2014 11:24 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Two cpufreq notifiers CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE and CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE were unused
> > since sometime. And so better remove them to clean code a bit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Queued up for 3.15, thanks!
> > ---
> > Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt | 4 ----
> > arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 3 +--
> > arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c | 3 ---
> > arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c | 3 +--
> > arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c | 3 +--
> > arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 3 +--
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +--
> > drivers/pcmcia/sa11xx_base.c | 3 ---
> > drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c | 3 +--
> > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 --
> > 11 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt b/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt
> > index ce0666e..0060d76 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt
> > @@ -92,7 +92,3 @@ values:
> > cpu - number of the affected CPU
> > old - old frequency
> > new - new frequency
> > -
> > -If the cpufreq core detects the frequency has changed while the system
> > -was suspended, these notifiers are called with CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE as
> > -second argument.
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> > index b7b4c86..7c4fada 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -674,8 +674,7 @@ static int cpufreq_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > }
> >
> > if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && freq->old < freq->new) ||
> > - (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new) ||
> > - (val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE || val == CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE)) {
> > + (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new)) {
> > loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(global_l_p_j_ref,
> > global_l_p_j_ref_freq,
> > freq->new);
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> > index 6591e26..dfc3213 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> > @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int twd_cpufreq_transition(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > * frequency. The timer is local to a cpu, so cross-call to the
> > * changing cpu.
> > */
> > - if (state == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE || state == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE)
> > + if (state == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE)
> > smp_call_function_single(freqs->cpu, twd_update_frequency,
> > NULL, 1);
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c
> > index 29905b1..41f27f6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c
> > @@ -885,9 +885,6 @@ static int viper_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > viper_set_core_cpu_voltage(freq->new, 0);
> > }
> > break;
> > - case CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE:
> > - viper_set_core_cpu_voltage(freq->new, 0);
> > - break;
> > default:
> > /* ignore */
> > break;
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c b/arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c
> > index 1f0ebde..863d893 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c
> > @@ -1121,8 +1121,7 @@ oprof_cpufreq_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, void *data)
> > int ret = 0;
> > struct cpufreq_freqs *frq = data;
> > if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && frq->old < frq->new) ||
> > - (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && frq->old > frq->new) ||
> > - (val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE || val == CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE))
> > + (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && frq->old > frq->new))
> > set_spu_profiling_frequency(frq->new, spu_cycle_reset);
> > return ret;
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c
> > index c3d82b5..b397e05 100644
> > --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c
> > @@ -659,8 +659,7 @@ static int sparc64_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val
> > ft->clock_tick_ref = cpu_data(cpu).clock_tick;
> > }
> > if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && freq->old < freq->new) ||
> > - (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new) ||
> > - (val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE)) {
> > + (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new)) {
> > cpu_data(cpu).clock_tick =
> > cpufreq_scale(ft->clock_tick_ref,
> > ft->ref_freq,
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> > index cfbe99f..7a9296a 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> > @@ -914,8 +914,7 @@ static int time_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
> > tsc_khz_ref = tsc_khz;
> > }
> > if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && freq->old < freq->new) ||
> > - (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new) ||
> > - (val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE)) {
> > + (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new)) {
> > *lpj = cpufreq_scale(loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, freq->new);
> >
> > tsc_khz = cpufreq_scale(tsc_khz_ref, ref_freq, freq->new);
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index bf7f9c2..d0f0b7b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -264,8 +264,7 @@ static void adjust_jiffies(unsigned long val, struct cpufreq_freqs *ci)
> > pr_debug("saving %lu as reference value for loops_per_jiffy; freq is %u kHz\n",
> > l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq);
> > }
> > - if ((val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && ci->old != ci->new) ||
> > - (val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE || val == CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE)) {
> > + if (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && ci->old != ci->new) {
> > loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq,
> > ci->new);
> > pr_debug("scaling loops_per_jiffy to %lu for frequency %u kHz\n",
> > diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/sa11xx_base.c b/drivers/pcmcia/sa11xx_base.c
> > index 6eecd7c..54d3089 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pcmcia/sa11xx_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/sa11xx_base.c
> > @@ -125,9 +125,6 @@ sa1100_pcmcia_frequency_change(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt,
> > if (freqs->new < freqs->old)
> > sa1100_pcmcia_set_mecr(skt, freqs->new);
> > break;
> > - case CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE:
> > - sa1100_pcmcia_set_mecr(skt, freqs->new);
> > - break;
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> > index be33d2b..7e0b626 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> > @@ -1041,8 +1041,7 @@ static int sci_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
> >
> > sci_port = container_of(self, struct sci_port, freq_transition);
> >
> > - if ((phase == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE) ||
> > - (phase == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE)) {
> > + if (phase == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE) {
> > struct uart_port *port = &sci_port->port;
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > index e5cebce..4c3bcdc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > @@ -320,8 +320,6 @@ static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {}
> > /* Transition notifiers */
> > #define CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE (0)
> > #define CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE (1)
> > -#define CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE (8)
> > -#define CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE (9)
> >
> > /* Policy Notifiers */
> > #define CPUFREQ_ADJUST (0)
> >
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists