[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140319144353.GC25953@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:43:53 -0400
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] perf tools: Use tid in mmap/mmap2 events to find
maps
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 04:27:25PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 19.03.2014 15:30, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:19:45AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:13:38AM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >>> On 18.03.2014 23:25, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>>> From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Now that we can properly synthesize threads system-wide, make sure the
> >>>> mmap and mmap2 events use tids instead of pids to locate their maps.
> >>>
> >>> This is a good change but it cannot go yet because it is dependent on Jiri's
> >>> "perf tools: Share map groups within process" series.
> >>
> >> No it isn't. :-) Commit bfd66cc71a3f831ba7c2116d79416cfb8883f6cf is the
> >> reason why. It synthesizes thread events to make this work correctly.
> >
> > ok, I haven't realized this one was pulled in as well ;-)
> > it's ok then..
>
> No, you mustn't split up the maps between threads. We currently assume
> CLONE_VM is always used to create threads.
But that doesn't work when you try to synthesize threads which was the
problem I was trying to solve.
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists