[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAsK9AGumcqE3qoEycjqmFdn3ERvpPx41WwZe0YRUv+1sf0rxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:28:16 +0100
From: Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Teodora Baluta <teobaluta@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] QR encoding for Oops messages
Hi,
2014-03-19 21:18 GMT+01:00 Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 02:59:47PM -0700, Teodora Baluta wrote:
> > This feature encodes Oops messages into a QR barcode that is scannable by
> > any device with a camera.
>
> ...
>
> > include/linux/print_oops.h | 11 +
> > include/linux/qrencode.h | 546 +++++++++++++
> > kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> > kernel/panic.c | 5 +
> > kernel/print_oops.c | 173 +++++
> > kernel/printk/printk.c | 9 +-
> > lib/Kconfig | 5 +
> > lib/Kconfig.debug | 11 +
> > lib/Makefile | 3 +
> > lib/qr/Makefile | 6 +
> > lib/qr/bitstream.c | 233 ++++++
> > lib/qr/bitstream.h | 37 +
> > lib/qr/mask.c | 320 ++++++++
> > lib/qr/mask.h | 39 +
> > lib/qr/mmask.c | 175 +++++
> > lib/qr/mmask.h | 36 +
> > lib/qr/mqrspec.c | 259 +++++++
> > lib/qr/mqrspec.h | 155 ++++
> > lib/qr/qrencode.c | 871 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/qr/qrencode.h | 546 +++++++++++++
> > lib/qr/qrinput.c | 1834 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/qr/qrinput.h | 129 ++++
> > lib/qr/qrspec.c | 543 +++++++++++++
> > lib/qr/qrspec.h | 178 +++++
> > lib/qr/rscode.c | 325 ++++++++
> > lib/qr/rscode.h | 38 +
> > lib/qr/split.c | 331 ++++++++
> > lib/qr/split.h | 44 ++
> > 28 files changed, 6860 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
This idea is certainly great.
However, there are quite a few problems with the code in terms of code style and
other terms as well. I am not sure how could we help you make this code
appliable, but it would be great if you put up a branch somewhere. This way
I could send you a few commits that do some fixups.
>
> That's a ton of code we're adding into one of the most fragile parts of the kernel.
Indeed, this should get split up.
>
> A lot of what libqrencode does would seem to be superfluous to the requirements
> here, as we don't output kernel oopses in kanji for eg, and won't care about
> multiple versions of the qr spec.
>
> How much of this could we drop ?
A lot, most likely.
Also, I wonder if we could do the same for panic()?
I hate it when I receive a panic and I have no idea what's the cause
since my display is filled up with the stack trace.
--
Regards,
Levente Kurusa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists