linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] mfd: lpc_ich: Fix ACPI enable bitmask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140319214736.GC20260@lee--X1>
Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:47:36 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Peter Tyser <ptyser@...-inc.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	James Ralston <james.d.ralston@...el.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mfd: lpc_ich: Fix ACPI enable bitmask

> > > >>>>The original bitmask of 0x10 was incorrect and would result in a write
> > > >>>>to a reserved read-only bit instead of enabling the ACPI I/O
> > > >>>>region.  Update it to the proper value of 0x80.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@...-inc.com>
> > > >>>>Tested-by: Rajat Jain <rajatjain@...iper.net>
> > > >>>>Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > > >>>>Cc: James Ralston <james.d.ralston@...el.com>
> > > >>>>Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
> > > >>>>Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Who is going to pick up this series ?
> > > >>
> > > >>I will, once I've completed the review.
> > > >
> > > >Okay review complete, phew!
> > > >
> > > >Guenter, How do you want to play this? Do you want me to create an
> > > >immutable branch for you to pull from?
> > > >
> > > 
> > > I'll be happy if I can pull it from -next. Is it going to be there
> > > anytime soon ?
> > 
> > Well I pushed an updated version of the MFD today, so it should appear
> > in -next this evening.
> > 
> Hi Lee,
> 
> for some reason I still don't see the patches in linux-next, even though I see
> them in your mfd-next branch. Any idea what is happening ? Is it possible
> that Stephen picks up a different mfd-next tree ?

Yes, that's exactly what was happening.

I emailed Stephen a few hours ago to rectify the situation.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/