linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] ARM: avoid tracers in soft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADHgK6ssL=0XcM_shGmb9z1T3w5L5OWEJgs-v9VyT3=USwY4FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:26:52 -0700
From:	Sebastian Capella <sebastian.capella@...aro.org>
To:	Sebastian Capella <sebastian.capella@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Steven Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <k.khlebnikov@...sung.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Robin Holt <robin.m.holt@...il.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] ARM: avoid tracers in soft_restart

On 6 March 2014 15:45, Sebastian Capella <sebastian.capella@...aro.org> wrote:
> Quoting Sebastian Capella (2014-03-05 02:50:04)
>> Use of tracers in local_irq_disable is causes recursive aborts when
>> called with irqs disabled and using a temporary stack (hibernation).
>> Replace local_irq_disable with raw_local_irq_disable instead to
>> avoid tracers.

> I have not heard any feedback on this change, since V3 of the
> patchset.
> Is everyone ok with this as it is?
> Thomas, thanks for proposing this, is this looking ok to you?

ping

I haven't received any further communication / acks on this particular
patch, since Russell's ~approval below:

On 26 February 2014 15:37, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Great, I'm happy with this now.  I assume that the plan is to submit this
>  to my patch system when everyone's given their fill of acks?

Is this ok as it is?

Thanks,

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/