[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <532AD606.40406@parallels.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:50:30 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@...sung.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Kristian Høgsberg
<krh@...planet.net>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ryan Lortie <desrt@...rt.ca>,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] shm: add memfd_create() syscall
On 03/20/2014 03:29 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com> wrote:
>> On 03/20/2014 12:47 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>>> If I'm not mistaken in something obvious, this looks similar to /proc/pid/map_files
>>> feature, Pavel?
>>
>> It is, but the map_files will work "in the opposite direction" :) In the memfd
>> case one first gets an FD, then mmap()s it; in the /proc/pis/map_files case one
>> should first mmap() a region, then open it via /proc/self/map_files.
>>
>> But I don't know whether this matters.
>
> Yes, you can replace memfd_create() so far with:
> p = mmap(NULL, size, ..., MAP_ANON | MAP_SHARED, -1, 0);
> sprintf(path, "/proc/self/map_files/%lx-%lx", p, p + size);
> fd = open(path, O_RDWR);
>
> However, map_files is only enabled with CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE, the
> /proc/pid/map_files/ directory is root-only (at least I get EPERM if
> non-root),
Yes. But this is something we'd also like to have fixed :) Having two
parties willing the same makes it easier for the patch to get accepted.
> it doesn't provide the "name" argument which is very handy
> for debugging,
What if we make mmap's shmem_zero_setup() generate a meaningful name,
would it solve the debugging issue?
> it doesn't explicitly support sealing (it requires MAP_ANON to be backed
> by shmem)
Can you elaborate on this? The fd generated by sys_memfd() will be
shmem-backed, so will be the file opened via map_files link for the
MAP_ANON | MAP_SHARED mapping. So what are the problems to make it
support sealing?
> and it's a very weird API for something this simple.
:)
Thanks,
Pavel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists