lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2014 05:13:50 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...inux.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, angus.clark@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Remove useless consts from
 function arguments

On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 12:03 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Good catch. That wasn't my intention.
> > > Why?
> An oversight.

That's still not an explanation.

Why, unless cast away by the code itself, is
const removal a good thing?

It does serve as an indication to a reader what
the code does with the argument.

About the only reason I can think of arguing in
favor of removal is inconsistent application of
const within the module.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ