[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1395317630.7776.29.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 05:13:50 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
dwmw2@...radead.org, angus.clark@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Remove useless consts from
function arguments
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 12:03 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Good catch. That wasn't my intention.
> > > Why?
> An oversight.
That's still not an explanation.
Why, unless cast away by the code itself, is
const removal a good thing?
It does serve as an indication to a reader what
the code does with the argument.
About the only reason I can think of arguing in
favor of removal is inconsistent application of
const within the module.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists