[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <532A4C35.4090202@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:02:29 +0800
From: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joe@...ches.com, mingo@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17 for-tip V3] A series patches about sched priority.
On 03/19/2014 04:36 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I picked up all except:
>
> 2 - whcih I don't think should go through a scheduler tree
Peter, as you did not pick the patch 2, there will be a conflict when you
apply [3/17]. I sent a v2 for [3/17], which does not depend to [2/17].
Please replace [3/17] with the V2 one.
Thanx.
> 6 - its tools/ bits, the changelog wasn't clear if the MIN/MAX_NICE
> macros were uapi visible and I couldn't be bothered to figure it out.
> 8 - I don't like the pointless macro
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists