lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:04:50 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kswapd using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible code

On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Christoph caught one.  How does this look?

The fundamental decision to be made here is if we want the counter
overhead coming on platforms that do not have lockless percpu atomics
and therefore would require an irq on/off sequence for safe counter
increments.

So far we have said that we do allow the counters to be racy for
performance sake. Your patch would remove the races.

If we want to keep the races and the performance than we need to change
__count_vm_events to use raw_cpu_add instead of __this_cpu_add.


Subject: vmstat: Use raw_cpu_ops to avoid false positives on preemption checks

vm counters are allowed to be racy. Use raw_cpu_ops to avoid preemption checks.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>

Index: linux/include/linux/vmstat.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/vmstat.h	2014-02-10 08:54:02.318697828 -0600
+++ linux/include/linux/vmstat.h	2014-03-20 09:02:05.132852038 -0500
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct vm_event_state, v

 static inline void __count_vm_event(enum vm_event_item item)
 {
-	__this_cpu_inc(vm_event_states.event[item]);
+	raw_cpu_inc(vm_event_states.event[item]);
 }

 static inline void count_vm_event(enum vm_event_item item)
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static inline void count_vm_event(enum v

 static inline void __count_vm_events(enum vm_event_item item, long delta)
 {
-	__this_cpu_add(vm_event_states.event[item], delta);
+	raw_cpu_add(vm_event_states.event[item], delta);
 }

 static inline void count_vm_events(enum vm_event_item item, long delta)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ