[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <532B10F5.9010709@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:01:57 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
CC: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...technion.ac.il>,
"Jon D. Mason" <jdmason@...zu.us>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, calgary: use 8M TCE table size by default
On 03/20/2014 08:54 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hi hpa,
>
> I am wondering how to make progress on calgary issue now. We do want to
> cleanup kexec-tools code and move to passing memory ranges in bootparams.
>
> I see two choices here.
>
> - Take this patch in so that new kernel code will work with modified
> kexec-tools without any user intervention. (Both first and second kernel
> need to be new).
>
> - Don't take this patch in and calgary will be broken with new
> kexec-tools. And that will always require manual user intervention
> from user to force passing memmap on command line.
>
> I kind of prefer the first option so that even if there are some calgary
> machines out there, they will work automatically with new kernel and
> will require manual intervention only for old kernels and new kexec-tool
> cobination.
>
> But I can live with second option too if that's everybody agrees to and
> hopefully we don't get lots of reports of breaking kdump with kexec-tools
> upgrade.
>
The patch seems simple enough and doesn't require any new command line
hacks. It has been widely reviewed and acked, so I'll pick it up.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists