linux-kernel - Re: DMABOUNCE in pci-rcar

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <532B2485.6010005@codethink.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:25:25 +0100
From:	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: DMABOUNCE in pci-rcar

On 20/03/14 17:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2014 17:12:43 Ben Dooks wrote:
>> On 20/03/14 17:09, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 20 March 2014 16:04:36 Ben Dooks wrote:
>
>>>> As a note, if we now boot a Lager with DT on 3.14-rc3 series the USB
>>>> controllers no longer work with full 2GiB RAM enabled in the device
>>>> tree.
>>>
>>> Did it work before these patches got applied initially?
>>
>> It did, but I cannot remember if we where limiting DRAM to 1GiB
>> or not.
>
> I would assume you did, or you happened to never actually use
> memory higher than that for DMA during tests.
>
>>>> Could we work around this by having 1GiB of memory defined in the
>>>> 32bit memory and then add the rest of the 3GiB from the >32bit
>>>> area via LPAE? Will the kernel ever try to allocate DMA memory from
>>>> anything >32bit?
>>>
>>> You can solve the case for dma_alloc_coherent() this way, or by
>>> setting the mask correctly. It won't help you for dma_map_* though,
>>> which still requires someone to add support for swiotlb or using
>>> an IOMMU if present.
>>
>> We do not have an IOMMU present at the moment. Not sure how
>> to go about setting a mask on a pci-probed device.
>
> Ah, right. The mask is a problem because PCI devices assume that
> they can do DMA to any 32-bit masked address without calling
> dma_set_mask. Your trick to describe the system memory at a different
> physical alias would solve this part. Another option might be to
> add a quirk in the OHCI/EHCI drivers, if you are able to detect
> this special case from the PCI IDs. Whether we can allow the PCI host
> controller to just set a mask is an open question. If we decide to go
> that route, you should be able to do it using the add_bus() callback
> in the host controller driver. However, it would be a departure from
> the normal way of doing PCI DMA, and I can't foresee what the implications
> would be.

So doing:

static void pci_rcar_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
	if (dev->bus->ops == &rcar_pci_ops) {
		dev_info(&dev->dev, "applying new dma mask\n");
		dev->dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31);
	}
}

DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, pci_rcar_fixup);

Did not work for me :(

-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/