lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:05:39 +0100
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <>
To:	Mark Brown <>
CC:	Stephen Warren <>,
	Songhee Baek <>,
	Arun Shamanna Lakshmi <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Add support for multi register mux

On 03/20/2014 07:36 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:20:17PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 03/20/2014 05:48 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 04:44:00PM -0700, Arun Shamanna Lakshmi wrote:
>>>> If each bit of a 32 bit register maps to an input of a mux, then with
>>>> the current 'soc_enum' structure we cannot have more than 64 inputs
>>>> for the mux (because of reg and reg2 only).
>>> What makes you say that?  We currently have devices in mainline which
>>> have well over 32 inputs to muxes.
>> I think their register layout is different.
>> I found a number of large muxes where the register stores a 'integer'
>> indicating which mux input to select, e.g. Arizona, WM2200, etc. In this
>> case, an N-bit register could support up to 2^N inputs.
>> However, the registers in the Tegra AHUB use 1 bit position per input,
>> and require you to set one single bit at a time. Hence, an N bit
>> register (or string of registers) can support up to N inputs. In more
>> recent Tegra chips, we have at least >32 inputs and I think Arun was
>> saying even >64 inputs. That requires 2 or 3 or more .reg fields in
>> struct soc_enum.
> Right, that was my guess too (the mail wasn't terribly clear with the
> formatting, references to unpublished documents and so on) but that's
> not a straight mux, it's a value mux, and the limit with the current
> code is much lower on 32 bit systems (like at least some of the K1s)
> since muxes only use one of the current register fields.

It might make sense to add special code for supported muxes with a one-hot 
encoding instead of using a value mux. Having an large array where each 
entry is just 1<<n is a bit ugly in my opinion, especially if the value 
needs to be able to be larger than 2**64. But anyway the patch that modifies 
the soc_enum struct should also add the code that makes use of the new 
struct layout.

- Lars

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists