[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140321000605.993433327@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:09:54 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Andy Adamson <andros@...app.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 51/85] NFSv4: nfs4_stateid_is_current should return true for an invalid stateid
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
commit e1253be0ece1a95a02c7f5843194877471af8179 upstream.
When nfs4_set_rw_stateid() can fails by returning EIO to indicate that
the stateid is completely invalid, then it makes no sense to have it
trigger a retry of the READ or WRITE operation. Instead, we should just
have it fall through and attempt a recovery.
This fixes an infinite loop in which the client keeps replaying the same
bad stateid back to the server.
Reported-by: Andy Adamson <andros@...app.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393954269-3974-1-git-send-email-andros@netapp.com
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -3607,8 +3607,9 @@ static bool nfs4_stateid_is_current(nfs4
{
nfs4_stateid current_stateid;
- if (nfs4_set_rw_stateid(¤t_stateid, ctx, l_ctx, fmode))
- return false;
+ /* If the current stateid represents a lost lock, then exit */
+ if (nfs4_set_rw_stateid(¤t_stateid, ctx, l_ctx, fmode) == -EIO)
+ return true;
return nfs4_stateid_match(stateid, ¤t_stateid);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists