linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.10 45/85] tracing: Do not add event files for modules that fail tracepoints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140321000605.156837381@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:09:48 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 45/85] tracing: Do not add event files for modules that fail tracepoints

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>

commit 45ab2813d40d88fc575e753c38478de242d03f88 upstream.

If a module fails to add its tracepoints due to module tainting, do not
create the module event infrastructure in the debugfs directory. As the events
will not work and worse yet, they will silently fail, making the user wonder
why the events they enable do not display anything.

Having a warning on module load and the events not visible to the users
will make the cause of the problem much clearer.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140227154923.265882695@goodmis.org

Fixes: 6d723736e472 "tracing/events: add support for modules to TRACE_EVENT"
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 include/linux/tracepoint.h  |    6 ++++++
 kernel/trace/trace_events.c |   10 ++++++++++
 kernel/tracepoint.c         |    7 ++++++-
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
+++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
@@ -60,6 +60,12 @@ struct tp_module {
 	unsigned int num_tracepoints;
 	struct tracepoint * const *tracepoints_ptrs;
 };
+bool trace_module_has_bad_taint(struct module *mod);
+#else
+static inline bool trace_module_has_bad_taint(struct module *mod)
+{
+	return false;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
 
 struct tracepoint_iter {
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -1860,6 +1860,16 @@ static void trace_module_add_events(stru
 	struct ftrace_module_file_ops *file_ops = NULL;
 	struct ftrace_event_call **call, **start, **end;
 
+	if (!mod->num_trace_events)
+		return;
+
+	/* Don't add infrastructure for mods without tracepoints */
+	if (trace_module_has_bad_taint(mod)) {
+		pr_err("%s: module has bad taint, not creating trace events\n",
+		       mod->name);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	start = mod->trace_events;
 	end = mod->trace_events + mod->num_trace_events;
 
--- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
+++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
@@ -631,6 +631,11 @@ void tracepoint_iter_reset(struct tracep
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_iter_reset);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
+bool trace_module_has_bad_taint(struct module *mod)
+{
+	return mod->taints & ~((1 << TAINT_OOT_MODULE) | (1 << TAINT_CRAP));
+}
+
 static int tracepoint_module_coming(struct module *mod)
 {
 	struct tp_module *tp_mod, *iter;
@@ -641,7 +646,7 @@ static int tracepoint_module_coming(stru
 	 * module headers (for forced load), to make sure we don't cause a crash.
 	 * Staging and out-of-tree GPL modules are fine.
 	 */
-	if (mod->taints & ~((1 << TAINT_OOT_MODULE) | (1 << TAINT_CRAP)))
+	if (trace_module_has_bad_taint(mod))
 		return 0;
 	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
 	tp_mod = kmalloc(sizeof(struct tp_module), GFP_KERNEL);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/