[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <532BF80F.1080602@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:27:59 +0100
From: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, a.hajda@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/8] leds: Add sysfs and kernel internal API for flash
LEDs
On 03/20/2014 04:28 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 15:51 +0100, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Some LED devices support two operation modes - torch and
>> flash. This patch provides support for flash LED devices
>> in the LED subsystem by introducing new sysfs attributes
>> and kernel internal interface. The attributes being
>> introduced are: flash_mode, flash_timeout, max_flash_timeout,
>> flash_fault and hw_triggered.
>> The modifications aim to be compatible with V4L2 framework
>> requirements related to the flash devices management. The
>> design assumes that V4L2 driver can take of the LED class
>> device control and communicate with it through the kernel
>> internal interface. The LED sysfs interface is made
>> unavailable then.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
>> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
>> Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
>> Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
>> ---
>> drivers/leds/led-class.c | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/leds/led-core.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/leds/led-triggers.c | 17 +++-
>> drivers/leds/leds.h | 9 ++
>> include/linux/leds.h | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 486 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> It seems rather sad to have to insert that amount of code into the core
> LED files for something which only a small number of LEDs actually use.
> This will increase the footprint of the core LED code significantly.
>
> Is it not possible to add this as a module/extension to the LED core
> rather than completely entangling them?
OK, I'll try to decouple it.
Thanks,
Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists