lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:04:29 +0000
From:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:	Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT v3 6/9] powerpc: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic
 cacheinfo infrastructure

Hi Anshuman,

On 21/03/14 03:44, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 03/10/2014 04:42 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Anshuman,
>>
>> On 07/03/14 06:14, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> On 03/07/2014 09:36 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> On 02/19/2014 09:36 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>>> From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch removes the redundant sysfs cacheinfo code by making use of
>>>>> the newly introduced generic cacheinfo infrastructure.

[...]

>>>> When it is UNIFIED we return index 0, which is correct. But the index
>>>> for instruction and data cache seems to be swapped which wrong. This
>>>> will fetch invalid properties for any given cache type.
>>>>
>>
>> Ah, that's silly mistake on my side, will fix it.
>>
>>>> I have done some initial review and testing for this patch's impact on
>>>> PowerPC (ppc64 POWER specifically). I am trying to do some code clean-up
>>>> and re-arrangements. Will post out soon. Thanks !
>>
>> Thanks for taking time for testing and reviewing these patches.
> 
> Now that you got some of the problems to work on and resend the patches, I will
> hold on to the clean up patches I had.
> 

I have done most of the changes but still unable to find why the shared_cpu_map
is getting incorrect on PPC. All the other wrong entries are fixed. Any clue on
shared_cpu_map ?

Regards,
Sudeep

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists