[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6uUauuF=JUVvoc-se+neJVbCU9TbxORPvbahp66qJY4Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:37:10 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:30:08 -0700, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:27:36PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
>> > However, I still find myself coming back to a fundamental question: why
>> > were these bindings fine in April 2013, passed review, and were acked,
>> > but not fine today. Here's the links to the emails acking their
>> > introduction which Sylwester Nawrocki sent me:
>> >
>> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg61899.html
>> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg62458.html
>> >
>> > So... *shrug*. Make of this what you will.
>>
>> Thanks for the details, I'll just leave my tree as-is for now, as that
>> seems the simplest thing to do.
>
> Yes, please leave it in your tree. I've caused noise and trouble than I
> should, and could have handled it differently. I apologize.
s/should/should not have/
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists