[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F7314A69-24BE-42B9-8E99-8F9292B397C4@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 23:37:03 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] kmemleak: allow freeing internal objects after kmemleak was disabled
Hi Li,
On 17 Mar 2014, at 04:07, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com> wrote:
> Currently if kmemleak is disabled, the kmemleak objects can never be freed,
> no matter if it's disabled by a user or due to fatal errors.
>
> Those objects can be a big waste of memory.
>
> OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
> 1200264 1197433 99% 0.30K 46164 26 369312K kmemleak_object
>
> With this patch, internal objects will be freed immediately if kmemleak is
> disabled explicitly by a user. If it's disabled due to a kmemleak error,
> The user will be informed, and then he/she can reclaim memory with:
>
> # echo off > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
>
> v2: use "off" handler instead of "clear" handler to do this, suggested
> by Catalin.
I think there was a slight misunderstanding. My point was about "echo
scan=off” before “echo off”, they can just be squashed into the
same action of the latter.
I would keep the “clear” part separately as per your first patch. I
recall people asked in the past to still be able to analyse the reports
even though kmemleak failed or was disabled.
Thanks,
Catalin--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists