[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140323193807.GA10520@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 20:38:07 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/11] signals: disallow_signal() should flush the
potentially pending signal
disallow_signal() simply sets SIG_IGN, this is not enough and
recalc_sigpending() is simply pointless because in can never
change the state of TIF_SIGPENDING.
If we ignore a signal, we also need to do flush_sigqueue_mask() for
the case when this signal is pending, this way recalc_sigpending()
can actually clear TIF_SIGPENDING and we do not "leak" the allocated
siginfo's.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 7 +++++++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 30bfe53..a615110 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -3082,8 +3082,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(allow_signal);
void disallow_signal(int sig)
{
+ sigset_t mask;
+
+ sigemptyset(&mask);
+ sigaddset(&mask, sig);
+
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
current->sighand->action[(sig)-1].sa.sa_handler = SIG_IGN;
+ flush_sigqueue_mask(&mask, ¤t->signal->shared_pending);
+ flush_sigqueue_mask(&mask, ¤t->pending);
recalc_sigpending();
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists