[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140323.005010.1898428719601246326.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 00:50:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: rgb@...hat.com
Cc: linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eparis@...hat.com, sgrubb@...hat.com, hadi@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netlink: have netlink per-protocol bind function
return an error code.
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:39:11 -0400
> @@ -1441,6 +1441,17 @@ static int netlink_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
> if (!nladdr->nl_groups && (nlk->groups == NULL || !(u32)nlk->groups[0]))
> return 0;
>
> + if (nlk->netlink_bind && nladdr->nl_groups) {
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nlk->ngroups; i++)
> + if (test_bit(i, (long unsigned int *)&nladdr->nl_groups)) {
> + err = nlk->netlink_bind(i);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> + }
> +
You can't just leave a partially set of completed bindings in place.
It's not valid to leave half-baked state like this.
If you return an error, all of the binding state changes must be
completely undone.
If you can't find a way to do this cleanly, you'll need to find
a way for the audit code to not return an error.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists