linux-kernel - RE: [RFC V1 2/3] mfd: da9063: Add HWMON dependencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7A2AFC34A@SW-EX-MBX01.diasemi.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:28:12 +0000
From:	"Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	LINUX-DOC <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	LINUX-KERNEL <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LM-SENSORS <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@...aro.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	"Rob Landley" <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: RE: [RFC V1 2/3] mfd: da9063: Add HWMON dependencies

Hi Lee,

On 24 March 2014 08:03 Lee Jones wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Mar 2014, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote:
>> From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
>>
>> Dependencies required for DA9063 HWMON support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c        |   13 ++++++++++++-
>>  include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h  |    3 +++
>>  include/linux/mfd/da9063/pdata.h |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c b/drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c
>> index e70ae31..24c1838 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c
>> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ int da9063_device_init(struct da9063 *da9063, unsigned
>int irq)
>>  {
>>  	struct da9063_pdata *pdata = da9063->dev->platform_data;
>>  	int model, variant_id, variant_code;
>> +	int t_offset = 0;
>>  	int ret;
>>
>>  	if (pdata) {
>> @@ -171,8 +172,18 @@ int da9063_device_init(struct da9063 *da9063, unsigned
>int irq)
>>  	ret = mfd_add_devices(da9063->dev, -1, da9063_devs,
>>  			      ARRAY_SIZE(da9063_devs), NULL, da9063->irq_base,
>>  			      NULL);
>> -	if (ret)
>> +	if (ret) {
>>  		dev_err(da9063->dev, "Cannot add MFD cells\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = regmap_read(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_T_OFFSET, &t_offset);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		dev_warn(da9063->dev,
>> +			 "Temperature trimming value cannot be read (defaulting
>to 0)\n");
>> +
>> +	/* pass this on to the hwmon driver */
>> +	da9063->t_offset = t_offset;
>
>What's the logic for using a local variable for this prior to setting
>the attribute in the shared container?
>

Yep -- that's bad. I'll remove it.

>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h
>b/include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h
>> index 00a9aac..7327d37 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h
>> @@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ struct da9063 {
>>  	int		chip_irq;
>>  	unsigned int	irq_base;
>>  	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *regmap_irq;
>> +
>> +	/* Trimming */
>> +	int		t_offset;
>>  };
>>
>>  int da9063_device_init(struct da9063 *da9063, unsigned int irq);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/da9063/pdata.h
>b/include/linux/mfd/da9063/pdata.h
>> index 95c8742..576033e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mfd/da9063/pdata.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/da9063/pdata.h
>> @@ -62,6 +62,23 @@ struct da9063_regulators_pdata {
>>  	struct da9063_regulator_data	*regulator_data;
>>  };
>>
>> +/* HWMON platform data */
>> +#define DA9063_SET_ADCIN1_CUR_1UA	0x00
>> +#define DA9063_SET_ADCIN1_CUR_2UA	0x01
>> +#define DA9063_SET_ADCIN1_CUR_10UA	0x02
>> +#define DA9063_SET_ADCIN1_CUR_40UA	0x03
>> +#define DA9063_SET_ADCIN2_CUR_1UA	0x00
>> +#define DA9063_SET_ADCIN2_CUR_2UA	0x01
>> +#define DA9063_SET_ADCIN2_CUR_10UA	0x02
>> +#define DA9063_SET_ADCIN2_CUR_40UA	0x03
>> +#define DA9063_SET_ADCIN3_CUR_10UA	0x00
>
>Why differentiate? More succinctly:
>
>/* HWMON platform data */
>#define DA9063_SET_CUR_1UA	0x00
>#define DA9063_SET_CUR_2UA	0x01
>#define DA9063_SET_CUR_10UA	0x02
>#define DA9063_SET_CUR_40UA	0x03
>
>
Oh yeh... that makes much more sense.
I should have thought of that  :(
Sorry you had to review that part.

>> +struct da9063_hwmon_pdata {
>> +	unsigned char adcin1_cur;
>> +	unsigned char adcin2_cur;
>> +	unsigned char adcin3_cur;
>> +};
>> +
>>
>
>Now there are two new lines here.
>
Will erase them.

>>  /*
>>   * RGB LED configuration
>> @@ -106,6 +123,7 @@ struct da9063_pdata {
>>  	unsigned			flags;
>>  	struct da9063_regulators_pdata	*regulators_pdata;
>>  	struct led_platform_data	*leds_pdata;
>> +	struct da9063_hwmon_pdata	*hwmon_pdata;
>>  };
>
>Does this device support Device Tree?
>
Ah, well no. I've not added any DT stuff.
Is that an essential requirement now?

>>  #endif	/* __MFD_DA9063_PDATA_H__ */
>
>--
>Lee Jones
>Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
>Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Thanks,
Steve