[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878us0vv5g.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:49:15 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got conflicts in
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c and
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c between commit 825938307f81 ("Revert
> "drm/i915: don't touch the VDD when disabling the panel"") from Linus'
> tree and commits 4be7378004a0 ("drm/i915: drop ironlake_ prefix from edp
> panel/backlight functions"), dce56b3c626f ("drm/i915: save some time when
> waiting the eDP timings") and b3064154dfd3 ("drm/i915: Don't just say it,
> actually force edp vdd") from the drm tree.
>
> This latter commit in the drm tree seems to be solving the same problem
> as the one in Linus' tree (but slightly differently), so I just
> effectively dropped the patch from Linus' tree and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).
Ack. We took the long route in our -next to come to the conclusion that
a revert is the way to go, and that was then queued for 3.14.
Thanks,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists