[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140324111144.GA19368@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 07:11:44 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, ebiederm@...ssion.com, cwang@...pensource.com,
kaber@...sh.net, antonio@...hcoding.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/core: Use RCU_INIT_POINTER(x, NULL) in netpoll.c
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:42:46AM +0530, Monam Agarwal wrote:
> This patch replaces rcu_assign_pointer(x, NULL) with RCU_INIT_POINTER(x, NULL)
>
> The rcu_assign_pointer() ensures that the initialization of a structure
> is carried out before storing a pointer to that structure.
> And in the case of the NULL pointer, there is no structure to initialize.
> So, rcu_assign_pointer(p, NULL) can be safely converted to RCU_INIT_POINTER(p, NULL)
>
> Signed-off-by: Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@...il.com>
No, I don't think this is right. __netpoll_cleanup can be called in parallel
with bottom half access to dev->npinfo. rcu_assign pointer is safe against
those accesses, but RCU_INIT_POINTER is not.
Neil
> ---
> net/core/netpoll.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
> index 7291dde..41c4e9c 100644
> --- a/net/core/netpoll.c
> +++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
> @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ void __netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
> if (ops->ndo_netpoll_cleanup)
> ops->ndo_netpoll_cleanup(np->dev);
>
> - rcu_assign_pointer(np->dev->npinfo, NULL);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(np->dev->npinfo, NULL);
> call_rcu_bh(&npinfo->rcu, rcu_cleanup_netpoll_info);
> }
> }
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists